Replies posted by waldoinc | Razer Insider

Replies posted by waldoinc

9 Replies

S
Sun_King_1992
posted in Razer Support

Razer Blade Pro 17 2020 No XMP profile?

16.8k https://www.3dmark.com/fs/23165463 19.4k https://www.3dmark.com/fs/23165499

74
C
3 years ago
S
Sun_King_1992
posted in Razer Support

Razer Blade Pro 17 2020 No XMP profile?

I can tell you, at least from some preliminary runs, sticking with the UV will more than likely be your best bet. Physics scores ( depending on Razer power settings) are between 16.8k to 19.4k . I see a hard drop 1/2 though the run of 10fps. As to the 3200 without enabling XMP, I would suspect that Razer

74
C
3 years ago
S
Sun_King_1992
posted in Razer Support

Razer Blade Pro 17 2020 No XMP profile?

Sorry I have been away for a bit. Let me get that score. One thing that i have noted is the RAM timings that are loaded (non-XMP) are extremely loose. I am going to run a few tests and see what returns. Did you have any of the power settings changed on your Razer Performance page for the Blade?

74
C
3 years ago
S
Sun_King_1992
posted in Razer Support

Razer Blade Pro 17 2020 No XMP profile?

Yeah, that is not good at all. With the Crucial Kit, that i originally purchased, XMP system would run until used XTU to run a RAM test for 15+ minutes then crash. Default profile, it would function normally. I have run the G.Skill kit for an hour and no issues. One other test i ran was with Memtest, the Crucial Kit with XMP would not make it past the 4th test with our constant errors. That kit will be interesting to hear about, with the those timings.

74
C
3 years ago
S
Sun_King_1992
posted in Razer Support

Razer Blade Pro 17 2020 No XMP profile?

I agree that the BIOS needs polishing, especially by what is considered and enthusiast product. I am not running a 64GB kits so i can not speak to that capacity. What XMP are you trying to run, I see that kit has 2 profiles, if i am looking at the right kit

74
C
3 years ago
S
Sun_King_1992
posted in Razer Support

Razer Blade Pro 17 2020 No XMP profile?

I have attached the screenshots of Hardware Info, that at least confirm my suspicion that the machines have issues with 1.35v XMP memory kits. One odd thing to note, is that the G.Skill kit ( at least the one that i recieved) was running at 3200MHz with out the XMP enabled. Timings were a bit looser than what the XMP was configured for.

74
C
3 years ago
S
Sun_King_1992
posted in Razer Support

Razer Blade Pro 17 2020 No XMP profile?

Short on time right now, but my machine is booting on the new RAM kit that i have. I will post more, later today. F4-3200C18D-32GRS - New RAM Kit.

74
C
3 years ago
S
Sun_King_1992
posted in Razer Support

Razer Blade Pro 17 2020 No XMP profile?

autoFawnPERIDOT525Return it an get corsair vengeance 3000 xmp 16 or 17 cl 32 gig kits. They work fine. i don't think these boards support 3200 mhz memory Out of curiosity, what are your timing on the kit? Also I am going to be doing a bit more investigating, got an odd hunch. Thinking it might be a mem voltage issue. Edit : Well I think the RAM voltage may be the culprit, to some extent. From looking at the Stock Ram, it is running at 1.2v at 2933MHz. (Horrible Timings - 21-21-21-47) The Crucial Ballistix kit is rated to run at the 3200 XMP setting at 1.35 volts. The Corsair Kit that autoFawn has is rated to run the 3000 XMP at 1.2 volts. I have ordered a different kit of RAM to test this, but we shall see.

74
C
3 years ago
S
Sun_King_1992
posted in Razer Support

Razer Blade Pro 17 2020 No XMP profile?

Joining this party already in progress. :( I too have a Blade 2020 (Adv) and have installed the Crucial 3200 32gb kit. The XMP option was available, however it is not 100% stable. I think either the machine needs more time to train the sub-timings. I know it would be a monumental task, but it would be nice if we could manually set the Frequency and Primary timings, if not go nuts and configure all the timings. That would probably introduce more instability, but we enthusiasts love tweaking our machines :) As for the undervolting being removed, all these Intel Exploits ( for right now) are theoritical and have not been attack vectors for any malware yet, so removing / locking it down is a little overkill right now. Security wise sure I understand, but there always has to be a balance.

74
C
3 years ago

Badges

View More
CookiesCookie settings