Blade 17 | More Cores. Faster Screen. Bigger Wins. | Razer Insider

Blade 17 | More Cores. Faster Screen. Bigger Wins.

Show first post
This topic has been closed for comments

89 Replies

K
The 300hz refresh rate is nice but does anyone actually know what the response time is like and is it comparable to a desktop 144hz 1ms gtg response time experience for CSGO and valorant?
N
Userlevel 7
Sounds like perfection
RacianVD
Userlevel 7
How crispy 300Hz could be i wonder.Clearly you can't tell the difference from 240 to 300.
babideebabidoo
Userlevel 7
This would be great to game on the go! Ready up for the post pandemic crisis!
L
Oh man you making me jealous:wink_:
B
Userlevel 7
Frames win games! but 300hz screen is a cheat code!
B
Userlevel 7
Remember when I commented about the Blade 13 kicking posterior?

Well this one simply put, can kick rears so hard it can send the competition and the fps of your games flying to the moon!

Second to none!
The specs Thermaltake Versa C24 Snow Edition RGB Intel Core i5 8600K MSI MPG Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon AC G.Skill Trident Z 3400MHz CL16 ASUS ROG STRIX RTX 2060 Advanced Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500 GB Seasonic Prime Ultra 750 W Platinum Noctua NH-U12S Razer Stuff Goliathus Chroma Deathadder Elite Kraken Ultimate
Kenserky
Userlevel 7
One day it will be mine, oh yeah, one day it will be mine.
My bad for english mistakes but i try my best.
Joikansai
Rank
Userlevel 7
TrickyGizmo
So I'm trying to figure this out. Previously, I was looking at the latest Blade 15 Advanced with an OLED display, except it is backordered. Now there is the new Blade Pro 17, and aside from the lack of OLED and the addition of an Ethernet port, I don't see much difference. Similarly configured, the Blade Pro 17 is $500 more that the new 15 Advanced but I'm scratching my head as to why. The CPU for both is the i7-10875H, both GPUs are the RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, so performance will be equal. Oddly, the battery on the Blade Pro 17 is a lower capacity 70.5Whr, compared to the 80Whr on the 15 Advanced. Is the 120Hz 4k panel on the Blade 17 really $500 more than a 15" OLED screen?

I'm torn, the Blade 17 does allow for 2 M.2 devices, so more expansion, and it's in stock - at least for now. I just have become absolutely spoiled with OLED displays, but that is not an option on any 17" machine yet, so by getting the Blade 17, I feel as though I'm giving up a better screen on the 15 Advanced (at least for my purposes) and longer lasting battery. Thoughts???

No performance would be better on Blade pro, due better cooling solution and bigger cooling head room, last gen was also similar cpu gpu combination but pro model use higher gpu tdp that even better than most maxq laptops out there, for example on jerrodtech rtx2070 maxq Blade pro 2019, it beats performance most 2080maxq laptops he reviewed, and gpu synthetic benchmark showed 2080maxq Blade pro put in same range with an alienware Area 51m with full fat rtx 2070 desktop with two powerbrick and almost twice overall weight including power adapter.
About 4K Oled vs 4K 120 Hz as a Gamer i personally would vote the later with all of my heart for sure, 60Hz is maybe for video editor, I’ll cry having 60Hz with that beast gpu.
Razer Blade 14 2021 QHD 165Hz | Ryzen 9 5900HX| RTX 3070 100W | 16GB DDR4 3200MHz | 1TB l Razer Blade 15 Advanced 2018 FHD 144Hz | i7-8750H | GTX 1070MQ | 16GB DDR4 2666MHz | 256 GB Corev2 | RTX 3070 Zotac Twin Edge OC | Razer Book 13 2020 FHD | i7-1165g7 | Intel Xe 96EU | 16GB LPDDR4X 4266MHz | 1Tb GB Razer Core V2 | RTX3070 | Zotac TwinOC Razer | Blade Stealth 13 2019 FHD | i7-1065g7 | GTX 1650MQ | 16GB LPDDR4 3744MHz | 512 GB | | Blade 14 2017 FHD | i7-7700HQ | GTX 1060 | 16GB DDR4 2400MHz | 512 GB | Razer Blade Stealth V2 2016 12,5 QHD | i7-7500U | HD620 | 8GB DDR3 1866MHz | 128 GB | | Blade 14 2015 IGZO QHD+ | i7–4720HQ | GT970M 3GB VRAM| 16GB DDR4 2400MHz | 256 GB | Razer Edge 2013 | i5-3317U | GT 640LE | 16GB DDR3 | 128 GB | Razer Phone 2| Razer Phone L33T Edition
T
Userlevel 4
So I'm trying to figure this out. Previously, I was looking at the latest Blade 15 Advanced with an OLED display, except it is backordered. Now there is the new Blade Pro 17, and aside from the lack of OLED and the addition of an Ethernet port, I don't see much difference. Similarly configured, the Blade Pro 17 is $500 more that the new 15 Advanced but I'm scratching my head as to why. The CPU for both is the i7-10875H, both GPUs are the RTX 2080 Super Max-Q, so performance will be equal. Oddly, the battery on the Blade Pro 17 is a lower capacity 70.5Whr, compared to the 80Whr on the 15 Advanced. Is the 120Hz 4k panel on the Blade 17 really $500 more than a 15" OLED screen?

I'm torn, the Blade 17 does allow for 2 M.2 devices, so more expansion, and it's in stock - at least for now. I just have become absolutely spoiled with OLED displays, but that is not an option on any 17" machine yet, so by getting the Blade 17, I feel as though I'm giving up a better screen on the 15 Advanced (at least for my purposes) and longer lasting battery. Thoughts???
Natachat90
Rank
Userlevel 7
Hello friends,

The new Razer Blade Pro 17 is a dream.
I love it just by looking at the picture and these technical specifications. ^ _ ^
The perfect computer for the traveling gamer.
My Tweeter channel @Natachat2077 for exchange good tips, contests, product tests and participatory marketing.My hobbies: Cooking and Salsa.I love sci-fi video games, expert in Mass Effect trilogy, Cyberpunk 2077 and Star Citizen since 2013. SC Referral code: STAR-6M2N-HNK3The future is great, Please Doctor Who pick me up with the Tardis. ^ _ ^
dodo_0
Userlevel 7
Oow, the new Razer Blade Pro 17 is freaky good! This laptop could run every game in the next 2-3 years at max for sure.

ALUMINUM UNIBODY ( I LOVE IT )
- CNC milled and cut from a single aluminum block for a robust frame. The anodized matte finish protects against external scratches.

One question because I didn't see if the display is flicker free, at all levels of brightness?
0V3R_K1LL
Rank
Userlevel 7
I mean the 10th gen intel is fine but would have loved to see Ryzen since the intel chips already run just as hot or even more so. Would have made it a productivity beast but I guess Razer is targeting gamers with this release more.
DRIFT_IT
Userlevel 7
The 300hz panel is dope. I mean im still stuck at 75hz but damn 300hz must feel intense.
i7 6700k Nvidia GTX 1060 8 GB Corsair DDR4 Gigabyte G1 Gaming Motherboard
CookiesCookie settings